If you were ask which is more important love or money, which one are you going to choose? some people may say love is more important and some may say money and there is nothing wrong with that, however, if to me, if i say money is more important, then it sounds ridiculous. however, each and every one has their own opinion.
love can be categorised as love to family, friends,boyfriend or girlfriend ,pets,etc. People who claim that money is more important said that it is because money can buy everything for them. There is no need to have love as a person claims that he/she will have a BF/GF who is rich,no love is required, 'as long as he /she can support me is enough'.(cewek matre)
Not only that, just now, i just saw a case where money can buy the value/ tie of a family. Just imagine at how a sister who cares too much for money and can use/corrupt the money for her own use eventhough that is not her own money- it is a company's money which owned by the family(brothers and sisters). I think to her, money is more important than the family tie itself.
Sometimes because of money, people cannot think logically (red eyes)
Some people may just 'bela' a person who is in fact on the wrong side eventhough that person know that he/she is wrong.
not much too say on these, it depends on what type of persons are they? what do u think?
there are also some kind of people who are too scared to voice out what they want, they are just under the rule of the parents.although she is big enough to make a decison and just please have ur own decison and know what u are going to do, dont just follow what other people do, as u scare of making a mistake. if like these u cant grow up and be a real person, make ur own decison. and be humble, u are too stuck up or proud of urself already but on the facts u are not that great, u are just a normal person who is really know nothing about this world, so dont be too sombong and thinks that u know everything, actaully u are not, i dont like this kind of people ( i am referring to someone who i know that her attitude is quite intolerable already, nt to everybody, i wrote this down because i think she may look at this article and she may realise who she is and try to change her attitude, cant talk to her, if not i will become mad) hope that she will look at it.
Some people are just dont know how to say a' 'thank you'/appreciation to the person who has helped her/him, think that they are so great and innocent
Saturday, February 26, 2005
racist, justice, biased?
According to Andi Malarangeng, Indonesia should increase the price of fuel, no matter what, it is like 'a decision that should be made by a leader whether it is fully suported by the people or not, if it is not supported by the people then it will be bitter like medicine when you put it into your mouth but you will recover'
i like the analogy, it is a very good analogy
the reason given is because the government has subsided rp 60 millions for the fuel itself, he said that by subsidising the fuel, who use more of it, they are the one who get more subsidition, and in the advertisement that I saw in Indo is like they show that most upper class or middle class people are the one who use the fuel.However, they must not forget that a lot of working class people who are using it, such as nowadays there is a lot of public transportations which owned by working class people ( alot of sudako) in medan, especially in certain areas which causes traffic jammed as they stop whenever they like.
Further, what can i say is that , there is still a big gap / racism. for example like the police, if they see a motor rider is Indonesian without wearing helmet, they wont ask him/she to stop, but if they see a chinese, then dont expect them not to stop u, they wont give u any 'tilang' if u just give them money.
they think that chinese is rich so if they stop them, for sure the police will get money as sometimes also the chinese dont want to get into any trouble with them. on the other hand, the indonesian , some may give but some may not give, if they want to 'tilang' thenn just do it. or even they give, it only in a small amount.
What they see is that all chinese are rich and vice versa,but actually if we see properly, there is a lot of indonesian who are very rich.
If there is like these case, where do justice stand? not only that sometimes, head of the police itself who actaully are ............(better not to say it out)
Like what I said in the previous article that government has increased the price of fuel by 30% in the early of March without agreement/ consent from DPR( Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat). What DPR asked the government to give (audit harga pokok BBM) could not be produced. However, the government will audit the price of fuel for this year.
It seems that eventhough DPR exists to represent public in the government, but sometimes they also cannot do anything. It seems to exist because that is the way the system of government should be, since the government can increase the price without the consent, where does DPR actually stand?
i like the analogy, it is a very good analogy
the reason given is because the government has subsided rp 60 millions for the fuel itself, he said that by subsidising the fuel, who use more of it, they are the one who get more subsidition, and in the advertisement that I saw in Indo is like they show that most upper class or middle class people are the one who use the fuel.However, they must not forget that a lot of working class people who are using it, such as nowadays there is a lot of public transportations which owned by working class people ( alot of sudako) in medan, especially in certain areas which causes traffic jammed as they stop whenever they like.
Further, what can i say is that , there is still a big gap / racism. for example like the police, if they see a motor rider is Indonesian without wearing helmet, they wont ask him/she to stop, but if they see a chinese, then dont expect them not to stop u, they wont give u any 'tilang' if u just give them money.
they think that chinese is rich so if they stop them, for sure the police will get money as sometimes also the chinese dont want to get into any trouble with them. on the other hand, the indonesian , some may give but some may not give, if they want to 'tilang' thenn just do it. or even they give, it only in a small amount.
What they see is that all chinese are rich and vice versa,but actually if we see properly, there is a lot of indonesian who are very rich.
If there is like these case, where do justice stand? not only that sometimes, head of the police itself who actaully are ............(better not to say it out)
Like what I said in the previous article that government has increased the price of fuel by 30% in the early of March without agreement/ consent from DPR( Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat). What DPR asked the government to give (audit harga pokok BBM) could not be produced. However, the government will audit the price of fuel for this year.
It seems that eventhough DPR exists to represent public in the government, but sometimes they also cannot do anything. It seems to exist because that is the way the system of government should be, since the government can increase the price without the consent, where does DPR actually stand?
Friday, February 25, 2005
what are u doing?
too happy to see mr J?
why u open ur mouth? becareful if not lalat will come into ur mouth.
would u like to have anything to eat?
3 sleeping heads
fainted?
study too much or go to zouk too much?hahaha joking
Pak lan, why u knock ur hand to ur head? relax dont become gila ahahaha
Thursday, February 24, 2005
PR
I was reading an article in 'Star' that application of a PR (permanent Residence) in Malaysia is not as easy as in other countries, and I totally agree with it.
Just take a case: my former landlady in Penang who married to a Penangite, they have a son who is already about 10/12 years old but till now she is still trying to apply for PR. At first, an officer told her that she should wait for five years in order to get it.
Thereafter, after that five years, another officer told her to wait for another two years and she cannot go back.
On the other hand, a 'hearsay' from a taxi driver that his friend got the PR after five years and could go back during that years. Further some people just said that a foreigner who married to a Malaysian could get/ have a job here without applying for the working permit. By contrast to what this article wrote that even a foreigner married to a Malaysian , one still need working permit as what happened to this lady named Kimberley Ann Gagnon " other employers are reluctant to employ me when they found that I do not have a PR because they do not want to pay for rm 5000 work permit and an expatriate salary".
It seems that the law in this field is blurred and not fixed , why? what are the criteria that they look into in order to apply for a PR?
There is also a case where a couple (foreigners) who can work here and get PR within a year.
"the Government will revoke the PR status of those who are involved in crime and terrorism". "the government looks at all angles and that includes security reasons. The granting of Pr is a privilege and not a right".
It seems that constitutional law is related in it under the topic of Parliamentary Privilege, I think. If 'the granting of a PR is privilege', then how can we know what are the criteriation and can it be said that some disadvantages of privilege occur or can it lead to abuse? for example , some of them might be biased/ racists.
Just take a case: my former landlady in Penang who married to a Penangite, they have a son who is already about 10/12 years old but till now she is still trying to apply for PR. At first, an officer told her that she should wait for five years in order to get it.
Thereafter, after that five years, another officer told her to wait for another two years and she cannot go back.
On the other hand, a 'hearsay' from a taxi driver that his friend got the PR after five years and could go back during that years. Further some people just said that a foreigner who married to a Malaysian could get/ have a job here without applying for the working permit. By contrast to what this article wrote that even a foreigner married to a Malaysian , one still need working permit as what happened to this lady named Kimberley Ann Gagnon " other employers are reluctant to employ me when they found that I do not have a PR because they do not want to pay for rm 5000 work permit and an expatriate salary".
It seems that the law in this field is blurred and not fixed , why? what are the criteria that they look into in order to apply for a PR?
There is also a case where a couple (foreigners) who can work here and get PR within a year.
"the Government will revoke the PR status of those who are involved in crime and terrorism". "the government looks at all angles and that includes security reasons. The granting of Pr is a privilege and not a right".
It seems that constitutional law is related in it under the topic of Parliamentary Privilege, I think. If 'the granting of a PR is privilege', then how can we know what are the criteriation and can it be said that some disadvantages of privilege occur or can it lead to abuse? for example , some of them might be biased/ racists.
Friday, February 18, 2005
increasing price of oil
Increasing the price of oil in Indonesia will be known on 15 Apr 2005. However, how much will it be rise, is still unknown. Most Indonesian are already in poverty and by increasing the price, will not that make these people's living worst qw it is already hard for them to survive in these days especially for working class people and below who live in a big city such as Jakarta. There is also a prediction that there will be a riot as aresult of the increasing price of oil (common). Yeah, it can be said that the oil price in Indonesia may be the cheapest and every year Pertamina loss a lot of profits.
Instead of increasing the price of oil, the government should actually increase the price of others as rising up the price of oil will also increase the price of others, therefore nowadays, it can be said that oils is also one of our essential needs. Rising up the price in this time of economic's situation may not be a good decision to make. I believe that before 15 Apr 2005, there will be some people(who sell oil) who will abuse and increase the oil price first before the announcement.
Not only have they been bit by natural disasters such as floods, tsunami,and now the price of oil would be increase too. If the government would like to rise up the oil's price, they should do something which will benefit society in other sectors such as free education, lowering the cost of living etc.
Instead of increasing the price of oil, the government should actually increase the price of others as rising up the price of oil will also increase the price of others, therefore nowadays, it can be said that oils is also one of our essential needs. Rising up the price in this time of economic's situation may not be a good decision to make. I believe that before 15 Apr 2005, there will be some people(who sell oil) who will abuse and increase the oil price first before the announcement.
Not only have they been bit by natural disasters such as floods, tsunami,and now the price of oil would be increase too. If the government would like to rise up the oil's price, they should do something which will benefit society in other sectors such as free education, lowering the cost of living etc.
Tuesday, February 15, 2005
freund and promise
What is 'freund'? according to the general meaning 'freund' means a person whom you know and whom you like but who is not a member of a family. If this is a mening of friend, can a person still be called as a friend when the person just need you or treat you as a friend whenever they need you and it is depended on their mood.
When their moods is not well or when you have done something wrong with or without you realising it, they will just pretend that you have never existed at all. If this type of person is also called as a friend, that is bullsh***t. Sometimes, if you have this kind of friends, it can make you feel sad, useless as it makes you to think of what's wrong with this person. Being treated like that by a friend that you just know may not be as hurt as being treated like that by your close friend.
This type of persons would only like to be your friend when they think they want to be ur friend or something has forced them to do like that such as promise made by them, etc. To some people, promise may just means promise where it does not really need to be done, it is in the sense that, a promise is just words/sentences/phrases that come out from one's mouth without the need to be enforceable.
However, to some people, promise is something that should be done. What you have promised to the other person must be done by you in order for that person to trust you eventhough how small or unimportant that promise, so my advice is make sure that you can do what you have promised/ told others to do before you made a promise to that person. Dont just be a 'big mouth'.
A promise may not be important to aperson who made it but it may be important to the person whom promise have been made to him/her.
When their moods is not well or when you have done something wrong with or without you realising it, they will just pretend that you have never existed at all. If this type of person is also called as a friend, that is bullsh***t. Sometimes, if you have this kind of friends, it can make you feel sad, useless as it makes you to think of what's wrong with this person. Being treated like that by a friend that you just know may not be as hurt as being treated like that by your close friend.
This type of persons would only like to be your friend when they think they want to be ur friend or something has forced them to do like that such as promise made by them, etc. To some people, promise may just means promise where it does not really need to be done, it is in the sense that, a promise is just words/sentences/phrases that come out from one's mouth without the need to be enforceable.
However, to some people, promise is something that should be done. What you have promised to the other person must be done by you in order for that person to trust you eventhough how small or unimportant that promise, so my advice is make sure that you can do what you have promised/ told others to do before you made a promise to that person. Dont just be a 'big mouth'.
A promise may not be important to aperson who made it but it may be important to the person whom promise have been made to him/her.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)